What’s inspirational about you? Essentially, to inspire means to influence an individual’s intentions or invigorate them to take initiative. And in today’s world, influence is more impactful than ever before. Lots of impressionable folks are always looking to be led. Do you believe that longing for leadership leads to a lack of liberty? If liberation is giving people liberty, and liberty is independence, liberating people makes them liable to live their lives without leadership. I believe that the idea of freedom feels far-fetched and fanciful because it’s difficult to fathom folks moving forward without a formula or format to follow. Additionally, I think people would be lost without leadership, and they’re afraid of liberty. Personally, I’m not easily influenced. I’ve made the mistake of trusting untrustworthy people in the past, and have participated in some people-pleasing, but changing my mind about consequential concerns is challenging. I think things through thoroughly, typically taking time to take everything into consideration. No, that doesn’t mean I’m immune from inaccuracies or inconsistencies, but I’m intentional with my intelligence. Anyhoo, if there’s one thing that I hate about the Opinion Era, it’s the fact that fools find the most followers. Is it me, or does it seem like the less a person has to say, the more people are interested? I know first-hand that fibbers and fabulists aren’t fond of being forced to face facts. In other words, opinionated and outspoken chatterboxes are often opposed to others’ open opinions. Why is that? Those who run to reveal their reactions should be ready for responses, as per Newton’s third law, “for every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction.” If you’re missing the point, reacting is an action that carries the same consequences as the act that caused it. With that in mind, if you’re an influencer, do you believe that you’re righteous enough to round up rightful and respectable responses from your followers—who are ready to reenact and regurgitate your every reaction? Being an inspiration is portraying a model for imitation. Remember, followers are frequently reflections of their idols, who echo their recitals. In religion, an idol is a token or totem in God’s image that followers worship in replacement of the incarnate version of him. Can you imagine impressing impressionable people so immensely that they decide to live as an impression of you? Better yet, should we consider imitating followers as impressionists, and do you think they’d find that offensive? A while back, music artist Doja Cat was trending following a fallout that she had with furious social media followers. And after the fiery, feisty feline made fans feel like her faults were unforgivable, approximately half a million of them unfollowed her. Being unbothered by the mass unfollowing, the ferocious feminist forwarded that she felt “free.” And that brings us back to the topic of liberty, or independence, or freedom—whatever you want to call it. What happens when a leader is being influenced by the reactions of their followers? In different terms, does people-pleasing place a premier player in a posterior position? If people applaud, admire, and appreciate a person for being distinctive, then turn around and criticize, condemn, and chop down said person for dissenting, they’re fickle and forgettable. On the other hand, so-called leaders who have an absence of autonomy aren’t appreciable, and they answer to their acolytes—which makes them adherents of their advocates. While I’m on this subject, I don’t have any affiliation or aspiration to align with assholes. Sir, you can choke on cigarette smoke and croak for all I care, you bald-headed-ass birdbrain! Fuck you and your “flying monkeys.” The same goes that Milk Dud head-ass moron, you fake-ass mini Morris Cashew! I really don’t know what else there is to say, other than, I choose “violence!”